nextnano3 - Tutorial
2D Tutorial
Electron wave functions in a cylindrical well (2D Quantum Corral)
Author:
Stefan Birner
==> This is the old website:
A new version of this tutorial can be found
here.
-> 2DQuantumCorral_nn3.in / *_nnp.in - input file for the nextnano3 and nextnano++
software
Electron wave functions in a cylindrical well (2D Quantum Corral)
A cylindrical InAs
quantum well (diameter 80 nm) is
surrounded by a cylindrical GaAs barrier (20 nm) which
is surrounded by air.
The whole sample is
160 nm x 160 nm.
We assume infinite GaAs barriers. This can be achieved by a circular
quantum cluster with Dirichlet boundary conditions, i.e. the wave function
is forced to be zero in the GaAs barrier. The electron mass of InAs is assumed
to be isotropic and parabolic (me = 0.026 m0).
Strain is not taken into account.
Electron wave functions
The size of the quantum cluster is a circle of diameter 80 nm.
The following figures shows the square of the electron
wave functions (i.e. psi²) of the corresponding eigenstates. They were calculated
within the effective-mass approximation (single-band) on a rectangular
finite-differences grid.
1st |
|
|
2nd |
|
|
3rd |
|
|
4th |
|
|
5th |
|
|
6th |
|
|
15th |
|
|
20th |
|
|
22th |
|
|
The following figure shows the energy spectrum of the quantum corral. (The
zero of energy corresponds to the InAs conduction band edge.)
One can clearly see the two-fold degeneracies of the states
2, 3
4, 5
7, 8
9, 10
11, 12
13, 14
16, 17
18, 19
20, 21
22, 23
24, 25
26, 27
28, 29
31, 32
33, 34
35, 36
37, 38
39, 40
The parameters of the quantum corral are the following:
- radius: a = 40 nm
- me = 0.026 m0
- V(r) = 0 for r < a
- V(r) = infinity for r > a
The energies are: Enl = hbar2 / (2me
a2) * jl,n2
which can be simplified to this formula: Enl = 0.0381 / (me
a2) eV * jl,n2
In the latter formula, me is dimensionless and a in units of
[nm]. (In the formula above, me is in units of [m0] and a
in [m].)
There is a formula to approximate jl,n: jl,n = ( n +
1/2 | l | - 1/4 ) pi
which is accurate as n -> infinity.
However, it seems that this formula is not accurate enough to compare the
results to the nextnano³ results..
|
Enl |
jl,n |
jl,n (approx.) |
[eV] (approx.) |
[eV] |
nextnano³ [eV] |
E1 = |
E10 |
2.405 = 0.765 pi |
0.75 pi |
0.005 08 |
0.005 28 |
0.005 11 |
E2 = |
E11 |
|
1.25 pi |
0.01412 |
|
0.01298 |
E3 = |
E1-1 |
|
1.25 pi |
0.01412 |
|
0.01298 |
E4 = |
E12 |
|
1.75 pi |
0.02768 |
|
0.02325 |
E5 = |
E1-2 |
|
1.75 pi |
0.02768 |
|
0.02325 |
E6 = |
E20 |
|
1.75 pi |
0.02768 |
|
0.02693 |
E7 = |
E21 |
|
2.25 pi |
0.04576 |
|
0.03597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Further details about the analytical solution of the cylindrical quantum well
with infinite barriers can be found in:
The Physics of Low-Dimensional Semiconductors - An
Introduction
John H. Davies
Cambridge University Press (1998)
|